The cash flow statement is an essential financial document that provides insights into a company's cash inflows and outflows from various business activities. There are two primary methods to prepare this statement: the direct and indirect methods. This article focuses on the indirect method, delving into its mechanics, advantages, and comparing it to the direct method.
What Is the Indirect Method?
The indirect method adjusts the operating section of the cash flow statement by starting with net income derived from the accrual method of accounting. This approach modifies the net income by incorporating increases and decreases in balance sheet accounts to bridge the gap between how these figures are recorded and the actual cash movements during a reporting period.
Key Characteristics of the Indirect Method
- Starts with Net Income: The cash flow statement begins with net income as stated in the income statement.
- Adjusts for Non-Cash Items: A variety of adjustments are made to remove non-cash transactions and accruals from net income. Common adjustments include depreciation, amortization, gains and losses on asset sales, and changes in working capital accounts like accounts receivable or payable.
- Commonly Used by Larger Firms: Due to its simplicity in data handling, particularly for firms that primarily use accrual accounting, the indirect method is the approach of choice for many large organizations.
The Mechanics of the Indirect Method
When preparing a cash flow statement using the indirect method, the following process is typically followed:
Starting Point: Net Income
The indirect method kicks off with the net income figure, which may include revenue recognized that hasn’t yet been collected in cash.
Adjustments to Net Income
Investors and analysts must adjust this net income figure for any transactions that do not affect cash. Common adjustments include:
- Depreciation and Amortization: These non-cash expenses reduce net income but do not involve a cash outflow.
- Changes in Working Capital: Increases in assets (e.g., accounts receivable) imply that cash is tied up and thus are subtracted from net income, while increases in liabilities (e.g., accounts payable) indicate cash has not yet been paid out, so they are added back.
Example
Suppose a company reports a net income of $1,000,000. During the reporting period: - Depreciation expense (a non-cash charge) is $100,000, - Accounts receivable increased by $50,000.
This means that the cash flow from operating activities can be calculated as follows:
- Start with net income: $1,000,000
- Add back depreciation: $1,000,000 + $100,000 = $1,100,000
- Subtract increase in accounts receivable: $1,100,000 - $50,000 = $1,050,000
This would show a cash flow from operations of $1,050,000.
Comparing Indirect Method vs. Direct Method
While both methods provide the same total cash from operating activities, the key difference lies in their presentation:
-
Direct Method: Lists actual cash inflows and outflows separately (e.g., cash received from customers, cash paid to suppliers). This offers a straightforward view of cash flows but can be complex and requires detailed accounting records.
-
Indirect Method: Starts with net income and adjusts for non-cash items and balance sheet changes. This method is generally preferred for its simplicity, especially in companies with large volumes of accrual entries.
FASB's Position on the Methodologies
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) favors the direct method for its greater clarity in cash flow reporting. However, companies that adopt the direct method are still advised to provide a reconciliation to net income, akin to the indirect method, for comparability and transparency.
Conclusion
In summary, the indirect method is an important tool for businesses when preparing cash flow statements, particularly those operating under accrual accounting. It simplifies the cash flow preparation process by starting with net income and adjusting for non-cash transactions and working capital changes. While the direct method provides more straightforward cash flow insights, the indirect method is widely favored, especially among larger firms, for its efficiency and ease of use. Regardless of the chosen method, the insights derived from a cash flow statement are indispensable for stakeholders looking to understand a company's financial health.