Unhrc 2020 Elections A Global Perspective On Human Rights Diplomacy

In 2020, the United Nations General Assembly elected 14 new member states to serve on the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC), the primary UN body responsible for promoting and protecting human rights worldwide. Established in 2006 to replace the former Human Rights Commission, the UNHRC consists of 47 member states, elected for three-year terms through a secret ballot, with seats distributed regionally to ensure equitable representation. The election is a critical event reflecting the global commitment to human rights, with India among those elected, while the United States had already withdrawn from the council in 2018, citing concerns over bias and inefficiency.

This election not only shapes the composition and focus of the UNHRC for the upcoming term but also influences the diplomatic landscape, impacting perceptions of legitimacy, influence, and the effectiveness of international human rights efforts. India's participation underscores its active engagement with multilateral institutions and its intent to shape international norms, contrasting with the US’s stance of skepticism and withdrawal. The 2020 elections exemplify the ongoing global debates surrounding reform, bias, and the geopolitics of human rights diplomacy.

---

Introduction to the UN Human Rights Council

The United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) is an intergovernmental body within the United Nations system, established by General Assembly Resolution 60/251 in March 2006. It replaced the former UN Human Rights Commission with the goal of strengthening the promotion and protection of human rights around the globe. The UNHRC is tasked with addressing pressing human rights issues, conducting investigations, issuing resolutions, and making recommendations to the international community.

The council is composed of 47 member states elected by the General Assembly through a secret ballot. These members serve staggered three-year terms, with seats allocated regionally to ensure geographic diversity:

• Africa: 13 seats
• Asia-Pacific: 13 seats
• Eastern Europe: 6 seats
• Latin America and the Caribbean: 8 seats
• Western Europe and Others: 7 seats

This regional distribution is designed to promote fair representation and prevent dominance by any single group, although geopolitical tensions often influence election outcomes.

When and Where

The 2020 elections for the UNHRC took place during the annual session of the UN General Assembly at the UN headquarters in New York. These elections are highly scrutinized as they reflect the political will of the international community to uphold human rights standards.

What Happened

In this election cycle, 14 countries were elected to fill vacant seats on the council for three-year terms starting in January 2021. The process involved candidates from different regional groups campaigning and securing votes through a secret ballot. The election results are often influenced by diplomatic negotiations, regional alliances, and the countries’ track records on human rights.

Immediate Causes and Significance

The ongoing global focus on human rights, especially amid crises like the COVID-19 pandemic, widespread protests, conflicts, and authoritarian tendencies in various countries, heightened the importance of these elections. Countries vying for seats often seek to project their human rights credentials or influence the council's agenda.

India’s successful bid for a seat aligned with its broader diplomatic strategy to elevate its stature on the international stage and to shape global human rights norms. Conversely, the US, which withdrew from the council in 2018, did not participate in the elections but remained a vocal critic of the council’s perceived biases.

Immediate Consequences

The election results determine the composition and focus areas of the UNHRC for the upcoming three years. Countries with contentious human rights records often face criticism, influencing their diplomatic relationships and international reputation. The election outcomes also impact the council’s credibility and its ability to effectively address human rights issues.

Evolution of the UNHRC

The UNHRC was created as part of a reform effort to address criticisms of its predecessor, the Human Rights Commission, which was often perceived as ineffective and biased, especially towards powerful countries. The new council aimed to enhance accountability, transparency, and credibility.

The US initially supported its establishment but withdrew in 2018, citing the council’s alleged bias against Israel and its inability to address human rights abuses impartially. This move underscored the politicization of the body and fueled debates over reform.

India’s Role in the UN and Human Rights

India has a long history of active participation in UN institutions. Its engagement with the UNHRC is part of its broader foreign policy strategy to promote multilateralism, enhance its diplomatic influence, and project itself as a responsible global power. India’s emphasis on development, anti-colonial principles, and strategic interests informs its approach to human rights issues within the UN framework.

US Withdrawal and Calls for Reform

The US’s withdrawal from the UNHRC was motivated by accusations of bias, particularly regarding Israel and select authoritarian regimes. It also reflected broader skepticism about the council’s effectiveness. The US has continued to criticize the UNHRC and advocate for reforms, including criteria for membership, transparency, and accountability.

UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC)

A 47-member body responsible for promoting and protecting human rights globally, operating under the auspices of the UN General Assembly. It conducts thematic debates, country-specific investigations, and adopts resolutions, though these are non-binding.

Regional Groups

The UN assigns member states to regional groups—Africa, Asia-Pacific, Eastern Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean, and Western Europe and Others—to ensure fair representation and facilitate elections.

Secret Ballot

A voting process ensuring confidentiality to prevent undue influence, pressure, or intimidation, vital for maintaining fairness in elections to the UNHRC.

International Norms and Resolutions

The UNHRC’s work is rooted in international law, including the UN Charter, Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), and subsequent treaties and treaties. Resolutions passed by the council, while non-binding, shape international discourse and influence state behavior.

Power Dynamics and Regional Influence

The elections to the UNHRC often mirror geopolitical alliances and regional influence. Countries with strong diplomatic networks tend to secure seats more easily, while contentious regimes may campaign aggressively to appear cooperative.

India's successful election reflects its rising diplomatic stature and influence within the Asia-Pacific region. It aligns with its broader efforts to be recognized as a leader in global governance, especially in the context of its rising economic and strategic power.

US-India Relations

India’s participation in the UNHRC is a positive signal within the framework of US-India diplomatic relations, which have been evolving steadily. The US’s criticism and withdrawal highlight disagreements over human rights standards and perceived political biases within the UN system. Future US engagement may depend on reforms aimed at addressing these concerns.

Impact of US Withdrawal

The US’s withdrawal in 2018 significantly impacted the council’s credibility, especially among Western nations. It also underscored divisions within the UN on how to address contentious issues like Israel-Palestine, authoritarian regimes, and select human rights abuses.

Calls for Reform within the UNHRC

Reform debates focus on criteria for membership, accountability mechanisms, and addressing politicization. Civil society and some member states advocate for stricter standards, while others emphasize sovereignty and non-interference.

India’s role as an elected member allows it to influence these debates, potentially advocating for reforms that balance sovereignty with accountability.

Multilateralism and Soft Power

India’s active participation in UN bodies reflects its commitment to multilateralism and its desire to project soft power. It seeks to shape international norms on development, climate change, and human rights, aligning with its strategic objectives.

Strategic Interests and Regional Influence

India’s engagement in the UNHRC also serves its regional interests, especially vis-à-vis China and Pakistan. By participating actively in global governance, India aims to bolster its diplomatic stature and counterbalance regional rivals.

Human Rights Discourse and Domestic Policies

India’s domestic human rights record has faced criticism, both internally and externally. Its participation in the UNHRC provides a platform to showcase its development achievements and argue against politicization of human rights issues, emphasizing sovereignty and non-interference.

India's Future Role

India's continued engagement in the UNHRC will depend on its diplomatic priorities and internal assessments of how participation affects its global image. Its influence can be used to push for reforms and to advocate for a more balanced approach to human rights.

US Re-engagement and Reform Efforts

The US remains committed to reforming the UNHRC, possibly seeking to re-engage once reforms are in place. The Biden administration has signaled a desire to restore US leadership in multilateral institutions, which could reshape the council’s dynamics.

Regional and Global Shifts

The evolving geopolitical landscape, including tensions between major powers, regional conflicts, and emerging economies, will influence future elections, reform debates, and the overall effectiveness of the UNHRC.

Broader Human Rights Challenges

The global human rights agenda faces mounting challenges, including conflicts, authoritarianism, digital surveillance, and climate change impacts. The UNHRC’s ability to adapt and respond effectively will be critical in shaping international responses.

Conclusion

The 2020 elections to the UN Human Rights Council underscored the complex interplay of diplomacy, geopolitics, and international norms. India’s successful bid highlighted its rising stature and strategic engagement with multilateral institutions, contrasting with the US’s withdrawal and calls for reform. These developments reflect broader trends in global governance, where power dynamics, regional influence, and debates over legitimacy and effectiveness shape the future of international human rights efforts. As the UNHRC continues to evolve, its capacity to address pressing human rights challenges will depend on reforms, cooperation, and the active participation of key states like India.