Pakistan Re Elected To Un Human Rights Council Despite Concerns

Pakistan’s re-election to the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in 2019 sparked controversy, as it occurred despite strong opposition from various activist groups citing significant concerns regarding the nation's human rights record. The UNHRC, established in 2006 by the UN General Assembly, serves as the primary UN body tasked with the global promotion and protection of human rights and addressing violations thereof. It replaced the UN Commission on Human Rights, which was previously criticized for its ineffectiveness and politicization.

The UNHRC comprises 47 member states elected by the UN General Assembly through a secret ballot for three-year terms, with a third of the members being renewed annually to ensure continuity. Membership allocation is based on equitable geographical distribution: 13 seats for African States, 13 for Asia-Pacific States, 8 for Latin American and Caribbean States, 7 for Western European and other States, and 6 for Eastern European States. All UN members are eligible to run for a seat, and to date, 117 countries have served on the Council. The Council convenes at least three regular sessions each year, totaling at least ten weeks, and can also hold special sessions to address urgent human rights situations. While the Council's decisions carry substantial political weight, they are not legally binding. The UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), a department within the UN Secretariat, provides support to the UNHRC by promoting and protecting human rights and coordinating related activities. In 2018, the United States withdrew from the UNHRC, citing political bias and the perception that the Council was a mockery of human rights. Human rights are fundamental rights inherent to all individuals, irrespective of nationality, sex, origin, religion, language, or status, encompassing the right to life, as well as rights related to food, education, work, health, and liberty. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), adopted in 1948, was the first comprehensive legal document outlining these rights. The UDHR, along with the International Covenant for Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, collectively form the International Bill of Rights, setting a global standard for human rights protection. A key feature of human rights is that they are inalienable, meaning they cannot be taken away except in specific situations and according to due process.

Pakistan's re-election to the UN Human Rights Council in 2019 reignited a complex debate surrounding the intersection of international diplomacy, human rights, and geopolitical realities. This event, occurring despite significant opposition from human rights organizations, underscores the intricate dynamics at play within the UN system and the challenges of upholding universal human rights standards amidst competing national interests. Pakistan's continued presence on the Council provides both an opportunity and a challenge: an opportunity for the nation to demonstrate its commitment to improving its human rights record and a challenge for the international community to hold it accountable for its actions.

The Genesis of the UN Human Rights Council

To fully understand the significance of Pakistan's re-election and the controversy surrounding it, it's essential to delve into the origins and evolution of the UN Human Rights Council itself. The UNHRC was established in 2006 by the UN General Assembly, replacing the UN Commission on Human Rights, which had become increasingly discredited due to its politicization and perceived ineffectiveness. Critics argued that the Commission allowed countries with egregious human rights records to become members, undermining its credibility and hindering its ability to address human rights violations effectively.

The creation of the UNHRC was intended to address these shortcomings and establish a more robust and credible body for promoting and protecting human rights worldwide. The Council was given a broader mandate and new mechanisms, including the Universal Periodic Review (UPR), which subjects all UN member states to a review of their human rights records every five years. This mechanism was designed to ensure that no country, regardless of its political influence or economic power, is exempt from scrutiny.

The UNHRC's structure and membership criteria were also designed to prevent the problems that plagued its predecessor. The Council consists of 47 member states, elected by the UN General Assembly through a secret ballot. Membership is based on equitable geographical distribution, ensuring representation from all regions of the world. The requirement of a secret ballot was intended to prevent political pressure and ensure that states vote based on their commitment to human rights principles.

Despite these reforms, the UNHRC has continued to face criticism and challenges. Some observers argue that the Council remains politicized, with certain countries being unfairly targeted while others are shielded from scrutiny. The withdrawal of the United States from the Council in 2018, under the Trump administration, further highlighted these concerns. The US cited the Council's alleged bias against Israel and its failure to address human rights violations in some of the world's worst-offending countries as reasons for its withdrawal. This historical context is crucial for understanding the backdrop against which Pakistan's re-election took place.

Key Actors and Their Agendas

The re-election of Pakistan to the UNHRC involved several key actors, each with their own interests and agendas. Understanding these actors and their motivations is essential for analyzing the implications of this event.

• Pakistan: As the country being re-elected, Pakistan has a vested interest in maintaining its membership on the UNHRC. Membership provides Pakistan with a platform to engage in international discussions on human rights issues, present its perspective on these issues, and potentially influence the Council's decisions. Furthermore, membership can enhance Pakistan's international standing and legitimacy, which is particularly important given its geopolitical significance and its complex relationship with neighboring countries. Pakistan's official position is that it is committed to upholding human rights and engaging constructively with the UNHRC. However, its underlying interests may also include avoiding international sanctions or other punitive measures related to its human rights record.

• Activist Groups: Human rights organizations played a crucial role in opposing Pakistan's re-election to the UNHRC. These groups have consistently raised concerns about Pakistan's human rights record, citing issues such as restrictions on freedom of expression, discrimination against religious minorities, and the use of the death penalty. Their official position is that Pakistan's human rights record makes it unsuitable for membership on the UNHRC. Their underlying interests are to hold Pakistan accountable for its human rights violations and to prevent it from using its membership on the Council to shield itself from scrutiny. These groups actively lobbied against Pakistan's re-election and continue to monitor and report on human rights issues in the country.

• UN Member States: The UN member states that voted in the UN General Assembly election for UNHRC members represent a diverse range of perspectives and interests. Some countries may have supported Pakistan's re-election based on geopolitical considerations, regional alliances, or a desire to maintain diplomatic relations. Others may have been influenced by concerns about Pakistan's human rights record and voted against its re-election. The voting patterns of UN member states reflect the complex interplay of factors that shape international relations and the challenges of achieving consensus on human rights issues.

• UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC): The UNHRC itself is a key actor in this scenario. Its role is to promote and protect human rights globally, and its credibility depends on its ability to address human rights violations effectively and impartially. The Council's procedures, mechanisms, and decisions are all relevant to the case of Pakistan's re-election. The Council's Universal Periodic Review (UPR) process, for example, provides a mechanism for assessing Pakistan's human rights record and making recommendations for improvement.

• UN General Assembly (UNGA): The UNGA is the main deliberative, policymaking, and representative organ of the United Nations. Its role in this context is to elect the members of the UNHRC. The UNGA's decisions reflect the collective will of the UN member states and are influenced by a variety of factors, including geopolitical considerations, human rights concerns, and regional alliances.

  Advertisement

• UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR): The OHCHR plays a crucial role in supporting the UNHRC and promoting human rights globally. It provides technical assistance to states, conducts research, and advocates for human rights. The OHCHR's reports and assessments of human rights situations in various countries, including Pakistan, can influence the decisions of the UNHRC and the UN General Assembly.

The Legal and Institutional Framework

The re-election of Pakistan to the UNHRC is situated within a broader legal and institutional framework that governs international human rights law and the functioning of the UN system. Understanding this framework is essential for analyzing the legal and political implications of this event.

• Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR): The UDHR, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1948, is a foundational document in international human rights law. It sets out fundamental human rights and freedoms that are considered universal and inalienable. The UDHR provides a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations and serves as a basis for evaluating the human rights records of individual countries, including Pakistan. The concerns raised by activist groups regarding Pakistan's human rights record are often based on alleged violations of the rights enshrined in the UDHR, such as the right to freedom of expression, the right to freedom of religion, and the right to freedom from torture.

• International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR): The ICCPR is a multilateral treaty adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1966. It elaborates on the civil and political rights set forth in the UDHR and makes them legally binding on states that ratify it. The ICCPR includes provisions on freedom of expression, freedom of religion, the right to a fair trial, and the right to participate in political life. Pakistan is a party to the ICCPR and is therefore legally obligated to respect and protect the rights enshrined in it. The concerns raised by activist groups regarding Pakistan's human rights record often relate to alleged violations of the ICCPR, such as restrictions on freedom of expression and the use of the death penalty.

• International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR): The ICESCR is another multilateral treaty adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1966. It elaborates on the economic, social, and cultural rights set forth in the UDHR and makes them legally binding on states that ratify it. The ICESCR includes provisions on the right to work, the right to education, the right to health, and the right to an adequate standard of living. Pakistan is a party to the ICESCR and is therefore legally obligated to respect and protect the rights enshrined in it. The concerns raised by activist groups regarding Pakistan's human rights record may also relate to alleged violations of the ICESCR, such as the failure to provide adequate access to education and healthcare for all citizens.

• UN Charter: The UN Charter is the founding document of the United Nations. It sets out the purposes and principles of the UN, including the promotion and protection of human rights. The UN Charter provides the legal basis for the establishment of the UN Human Rights Council and its mandate to address human rights violations worldwide.

• Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: While not directly related to the UNHRC, the Rome Statute is relevant to the broader context of international human rights law. The Rome Statute established the International Criminal Court (ICC), which has jurisdiction over genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression. Although Pakistan is not a party to the Rome Statute, the ICC's work in prosecuting individuals for serious human rights violations can have an indirect impact on Pakistan's human rights record and its standing in the international community.

  Advertisement

Pakistan's Human Rights Record: A Contentious Issue

The controversy surrounding Pakistan's re-election to the UNHRC stems from persistent concerns about its human rights record. These concerns have been raised by a variety of sources, including human rights organizations, international bodies, and governments.

• Freedom of Expression: One of the most frequently cited concerns is the restriction on freedom of expression in Pakistan. The government has been accused of using laws such as the Pakistan Penal Code and the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) to silence dissent and suppress criticism of the government and the military. Journalists, activists, and human rights defenders have been targeted with harassment, intimidation, and even violence for expressing their views. The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) has consistently ranked Pakistan as one of the most dangerous countries in the world for journalists.

• Religious Freedom: Another major concern is the discrimination against religious minorities in Pakistan. The country's blasphemy laws are often used to target members of minority religious groups, such as Christians and Hindus, with false accusations and violence. The government has also been accused of failing to protect religious minorities from mob violence and discrimination. The US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) has repeatedly recommended that Pakistan be designated as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC) due to its severe violations of religious freedom.

• Extrajudicial Killings and Enforced Disappearances: Human rights organizations have also documented numerous cases of extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances in Pakistan, particularly in Balochistan and other conflict-affected areas. Security forces have been accused of abducting and killing individuals without due process, and the government has been criticized for failing to investigate these cases and hold perpetrators accountable. The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) has called on Pakistan to end enforced disappearances and ensure that all individuals are afforded due process and a fair trial.

• Use of the Death Penalty: Pakistan has one of the highest rates of executions in the world. The government has been criticized for using the death penalty for a wide range of offenses, including blasphemy and terrorism-related crimes. Human rights organizations argue that the death penalty is a cruel and inhuman punishment and that it is often imposed after unfair trials. Amnesty International has called on Pakistan to abolish the death penalty and commute the sentences of all those currently on death row.

• Women's Rights: Women in Pakistan face significant discrimination and violence. They are often denied equal access to education, employment, and healthcare. Domestic violence, honor killings, and forced marriages are common. The government has taken some steps to protect women's rights, such as enacting laws against domestic violence and sexual harassment, but these laws are often poorly enforced. Human Rights Watch has called on Pakistan to strengthen its efforts to protect women's rights and ensure that perpetrators of violence against women are brought to justice.

Historical Precedents and Parallels

The re-election of Pakistan to the UNHRC is not an isolated event. It is part of a broader pattern of countries with questionable human rights records seeking and obtaining membership on international human rights bodies. Examining historical precedents and parallels can shed light on the underlying dynamics and implications of this event.

• US Withdrawal from the UNHRC in 2018: The US withdrawal from the UNHRC in 2018, under the Trump administration, is a significant historical precedent. The US cited the Council's alleged bias against Israel and its failure to address human rights violations in some of the world's worst-offending countries as reasons for its withdrawal. This decision highlighted the ongoing debates about the Council's effectiveness and impartiality and the willingness of some states to withdraw due to perceived shortcomings.

• Membership of Countries with Poor Human Rights Records: Throughout its history, the UN Human Rights Council has faced criticism for allowing countries with poor human rights records to become members. Critics argue that this undermines the Council's credibility and hinders its ability to address human rights violations effectively. Examples of countries with questionable human rights records that have served on the Council include China, Saudi Arabia, and Cuba.

• Politicization of Human Rights Issues: The politicization of human rights issues is a recurring theme in international relations. Countries often use human rights as a tool to advance their political interests or to criticize their rivals. This can lead to selective condemnation of human rights violations and a lack of consistent enforcement of human rights standards.

Stakeholder Positions and Conflicting Interests

The re-election of Pakistan to the UNHRC highlights the conflicting interests and perspectives of various stakeholders involved in international human rights issues.

• Pakistan's Perspective: Pakistan views its membership on the UNHRC as an opportunity to engage in international discussions on human rights issues, present its perspective on these issues, and potentially influence the Council's decisions. The government also sees membership as a way to enhance Pakistan's international standing and legitimacy. However, Pakistan's underlying interests may also include avoiding international sanctions or other punitive measures related to its human rights record.

• Activist Groups' Perspective: Human rights organizations view Pakistan's membership on the UNHRC as problematic, given its human rights record. They argue that Pakistan's presence on the Council undermines its credibility and hinders its ability to address human rights violations effectively. Their underlying interests are to hold Pakistan accountable for its human rights violations and to prevent it from using its membership on the Council to shield itself from scrutiny.

  Advertisement

• UN Member States' Perspectives: UN member states have varying perspectives on Pakistan's membership on the UNHRC. Some countries may support Pakistan's membership based on geopolitical considerations, regional alliances, or a desire to maintain diplomatic relations. Others may be influenced by concerns about Pakistan's human rights record and oppose its membership. The voting patterns of UN member states reflect the complex interplay of factors that shape international relations and the challenges of achieving consensus on human rights issues.

Broader Implications and Consequences

The re-election of Pakistan to the UNHRC has several broader implications and consequences for international relations, human rights, and the UN system.

• Impact on the Credibility of the UNHRC: The re-election of a country with a questionable human rights record can damage the credibility of the UNHRC and raise questions about its effectiveness. Critics may argue that the Council is not serious about addressing human rights violations if it allows countries with poor human rights records to become members.

• Implications for Human Rights in Pakistan: Pakistan's membership on the UNHRC could have both positive and negative implications for human rights in the country. On the one hand, it could provide an opportunity for the government to engage in constructive dialogue with the international community and to take steps to improve its human rights record. On the other hand, it could embolden the government to resist international pressure and to continue its repressive policies.

• Impact on International Relations: The re-election of Pakistan to the UNHRC could strain relations with countries and organizations that are critical of its human rights record. These countries and organizations may view Pakistan's membership as a sign that the international community is not serious about holding it accountable for its human rights violations.

• Geopolitical Considerations: The re-election of Pakistan to the UNHRC is also influenced by geopolitical considerations. Pakistan is a strategically important country in South Asia, and its relations with other countries, such as China and the United States, can affect its standing in the international community.

  Advertisement

Connections to Ongoing Issues and Future Outlook

The re-election of Pakistan to the UNHRC is connected to several ongoing issues and trends in international relations and human rights.

• Geopolitical Tensions between India and Pakistan: The ongoing tensions between India and Pakistan, particularly over the disputed territory of Kashmir, have a significant impact on their relations in international forums. India has consistently raised concerns about Pakistan's human rights record in Kashmir, and Pakistan has accused India of human rights violations in the region.

• The Rise of Authoritarianism: The rise of authoritarianism in many parts of the world is a challenge to international human rights efforts. Authoritarian regimes often resist international pressure to improve their human rights records and may even seek to undermine international human rights institutions.

• The Future of the UN Human Rights Council: The future of the UN Human Rights Council is uncertain. The Council faces ongoing challenges, such as politicization, a lack of resources, and resistance from some member states. However, it remains an important forum for addressing human rights violations worldwide, and its work is essential for promoting and protecting human rights globally.

In the future, Pakistan's performance on the UNHRC will be closely watched by the international community. Its actions will be scrutinized for compliance with human rights standards, and further criticism and pressure from activist groups are expected. India will likely continue to raise concerns about Pakistan's human rights record in various international forums. The re-election of Pakistan to the UNHRC serves as a reminder of the ongoing challenges and complexities of promoting and protecting human rights in a world characterized by conflicting interests and geopolitical tensions.