India And Asean Agree To Reassess 2009 Free Trade Agreement Amid Regional Strategic Shifts

India and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) have announced their intention to review the existing Free Trade Agreement (FTA) signed in 2009. This decision stems from the need to evaluate the agreement's effectiveness in the face of evolving regional economic and strategic dynamics, notably the rise of new trade frameworks like RCEP. The review was discussed during the 16th ASEAN-India Summit held in Bangkok, where leaders emphasized strengthening economic ties, regional connectivity, and strategic cooperation. India, ASEAN’s fourth-largest trading partner, aims to ensure that the trade pact remains relevant and beneficial, as regional integration efforts and economic complexities continue to grow.

The review signifies a critical step in recalibrating India-ASEAN economic relations, considering the shifting landscape of regional trade agreements and geopolitical considerations. It reflects India’s broader Act East Policy and regional strategy to deepen engagement with Southeast Asia, fostering economic growth, connectivity, and strategic partnerships. The process may lead to renegotiations, updates, or expansions of the existing trade framework, with potential implications for trade flows, regional diplomacy, and India's positioning within Southeast Asia.

---

The recent announcement by India and ASEAN to review their 2009 Free Trade Agreement (FTA) marks a pivotal moment in regional economic diplomacy. Signed over a decade ago, the FTA was intended to catalyze trade, investment, and regional integration between India and the ten member states of ASEAN. As regional economic and geopolitical landscapes evolve, both parties recognize the need to revisit the agreement to ensure it continues to serve their strategic and economic interests effectively.

This extensive analysis explores the background, content, and significance of the FTA review, threading through historical context, key actors, legal frameworks, regional dynamics, and future prospects. It also examines the broader implications for India’s foreign policy, regional security, and economic integration.

Foundations of ASEAN and India’s Engagement

ASEAN, established in 1967, emerged as a regional organization aimed at promoting economic growth, peace, stability, and cultural development among Southeast Asian nations. Its founding members—Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand—initially focused on political stability amidst Cold War tensions. Over the years, ASEAN expanded to include Brunei, Vietnam, Laos, Myanmar, and Cambodia, evolving into a comprehensive regional organization.

India’s engagement with ASEAN began in earnest in the early 1990s, driven by India’s Look East Policy, later renamed Act East Policy, aiming to strengthen economic, political, and strategic ties with Southeast Asia. Starting as a dialogue partner in 1992, India progressed to signing the Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Economic Cooperation (CECA) in 2003 and establishing the ASEAN-India Free Trade Area (AIFTA) in 2015.

The 2009 Free Trade Agreement

The ASEAN-India Free Trade Agreement, signed in 2009, was a landmark in regional cooperation. Its objective was to eliminate tariffs on a broad range of goods, facilitate trade in services, and promote investment. The agreement aimed to deepen economic integration, leverage ASEAN’s strategic location, and boost India’s trade with Southeast Asia.

The initial impact was promising, with bilateral trade increasing steadily. India became ASEAN’s fourth-largest trading partner, with trade volumes crossing $80 billion by the late 2010s. Key sectors included ships, mineral fuels, meats, telecom equipment, electrical machinery, and pharmaceuticals.

However, the agreement faced challenges, including uneven trade benefits, tariff barriers on specific sectors, and the emergence of competing regional trade frameworks. Subsequently, the ASEAN-India Free Trade Area was further integrated with the broader Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), which sought to create a massive free trade bloc covering over 30% of global GDP.

Context and Rationale

The decision to review the ASEAN-India FTA was announced during the 16th ASEAN-India Summit in Bangkok. Several factors contributed to this decision:

• Changing Regional Trade Dynamics: The regional trade landscape has shifted dramatically with the rise of RCEP negotiations, which include major economies like China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand. India’s absence from RCEP has raised questions about the relevance of existing bilateral agreements.

• Economic Challenges: Certain sectors did not benefit as expected, and some trade deficits persisted. The need to address non-tariff barriers, service sector integration, and investment facilitation became apparent.

• Strategic Considerations: Amid geopolitical shifts, India aims to balance its economic interests with strategic partnerships. Revisiting the FTA allows India to recalibrate its regional engagement amid rising competition and regional security concerns.

  Advertisement

• Regional Integration and Competitiveness: Ensuring that India remains competitive within the regional value chain, especially against China and RCEP member states, necessitates an updated and mutually beneficial trade framework.

The Summit and Stakeholder Positions

During the summit, leaders reaffirmed their commitment to regional cooperation and economic integration. Both India and ASEAN expressed the intention to evaluate the trade agreement thoroughly, involving consultations among member states and stakeholders. India’s Ministry of Commerce and Industry indicated the review aimed to "assess the effectiveness of the current agreement and identify areas for improvement."

ASEAN member states generally support updating existing frameworks, viewing it as essential for maintaining regional economic stability and growth. The review process is expected to encompass tariff schedules, rules of origin, trade in services, investment protocols, and dispute resolution mechanisms.

Existing Trade Frameworks

• ASEAN-India Free Trade Agreement (2009): The core legal instrument governing trade relations, emphasizing tariff reduction and trade facilitation.

• ASEAN-India Trade in Goods Agreement: Focused on reducing tariffs and non-tariff barriers, with provisions for trade in services and investment.

• ASEAN-India Maritime Cooperation and Connectivity Initiatives: Complementary protocols emphasizing physical and digital connectivity, infrastructure development, and people-to-people links.

  Advertisement

Processes for Review and Renegotiation

The review involves a multi-stage process: initial assessment, consultations among member states, stakeholder feedback, negotiations, and eventual agreement on amendments. The process respects ASEAN’s consensus-based decision-making and India’s diplomatic protocol.

Historically, similar reviews—such as the renegotiation of the India-South Korea FTA—have resulted in expanded market access and updated provisions, providing a blueprint for the current process.

RCEP and the Regional Trade Architecture

The RCEP, signed in November 2020 and coming into effect in 2022, is the world’s largest trade pact, covering 15 Asia-Pacific nations. Its inclusion of China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand, alongside ASEAN members, has altered regional trade flows and strategic alignments.

India’s decision to stay out of RCEP has been motivated by concerns over trade deficits, unfair competition, and sovereignty issues. However, RCEP’s emergence has prompted India to revisit existing bilateral agreements to ensure they remain relevant and beneficial.

India’s Act East Policy

The Act East Policy, launched in 2014, aims to deepen economic and strategic ties with Southeast Asia, East Asia, and the Indo-Pacific. The review of the ASEAN-India FTA aligns with this policy, seeking to enhance connectivity, infrastructure, and strategic cooperation.

Geopolitical Implications

The region’s strategic landscape has become more complex, with China asserting influence through initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB). India’s engagement with ASEAN and the review of trade agreements reflect efforts to bolster regional resilience and counterbalance Chinese influence.

India

India’s strategic goal is to leverage ASEAN as a counterbalance to China’s regional dominance, expand its economic footprint, and promote regional stability. The government’s approach emphasizes updating trade frameworks to address non-tariff barriers, facilitate services and investment, and improve dispute resolution.

ASEAN Member States

ASEAN’s member states prioritize economic growth, regional stability, and strategic autonomy. They view the review as an opportunity to optimize existing agreements, attract more investment, and deepen regional integration.

External Partners

China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand influence the regional trade architecture through RCEP and bilateral deals. The United States, through its Indo-Pacific strategy, encourages regional resilience and economic diversification.

Economic Impacts

• Trade Expansion: An updated FTA could facilitate increased trade volumes, particularly in services and investment, beyond just goods.

• Sectoral Benefits: Sectors like digital trade, pharmaceuticals, and green technology could see enhanced cooperation.

  Advertisement

• Addressing Trade Imbalances: The review offers an opportunity to manage persistent trade deficits and barriers.

Political and Strategic Outcomes

• Strengthening Ties: A successful review can deepen trust and cooperation between India and ASEAN.

• Geopolitical Signaling: Demonstrates India’s commitment to regional stability and economic integration amid regional competition.

Legal and Institutional Reforms

• Modernizing Provisions: Updating dispute settlement, intellectual property, and digital trade clauses to reflect contemporary realities.

• Institutional Mechanisms: Strengthening ASEAN-India economic cooperation bodies for implementation and monitoring.

Challenges and Controversies

• Divergent National Interests: ASEAN member states and India may have differing priorities, complicating consensus.

  Advertisement

• Trade Disputes and Protectionism: Domestic industries may resist opening markets further.

• Regional Competition: Balancing relations with China and RCEP members while pursuing bilateral updates.

The Future Outlook

The review process is ongoing, with expectations of renegotiations and potential amendments. If successful, it could lead to a more comprehensive and modernized trade framework fostering deeper economic integration. This, in turn, would reinforce India’s strategic posture in Southeast Asia, align with its Act East goals, and contribute to regional stability.

On a broader scale, the review exemplifies how regional trade agreements must adapt to rapid geopolitical and economic shifts. It also underscores the importance of flexible, forward-looking multilateral and bilateral arrangements in a multipolar world.

---

Connecting Broader Issues in Indian Foreign Relations

The review of the ASEAN-India FTA is a microcosm of India’s larger foreign policy trajectory, emphasizing regional engagement, economic diplomacy, and strategic resilience. It reflects India’s attempt to navigate a complex web of regional and global influences, balancing economic interests with strategic sovereignty.

India’s engagement with ASEAN is central to its Indo-Pacific strategy, which aims to promote free, open, and inclusive regional order. Updating trade agreements like the FTA is a tangible step toward realizing this vision, ensuring that India remains an influential and relevant player in Southeast Asian geopolitics.

Furthermore, the process highlights India’s commitment to multilateralism and regional cooperation, even amid rising protectionism and trade tensions globally. The ongoing review also demonstrates India’s willingness to adapt to new realities, emphasizing a pragmatic approach that considers economic, political, and strategic imperatives.

The outcome of this review could set a precedent for future regional trade negotiations, fostering a more integrated, resilient, and balanced regional architecture that aligns with India’s broader aspirations for a stable, prosperous Indo-Pacific region.

---