12th Asia Europe Meeting

The 12th Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) convened in Brussels, Belgium, in October 2018, under the theme "Europe and Asia: Global Partners for Global Challenges." ASEM, established in 1996, serves as an intergovernmental platform fostering dialogue and cooperation between 51 Asian and European countries, along with the European Union (EU) and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) as institutional partners. India became a member of ASEM in 2008.

The Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) stands as a critical, yet often understated, component of the international diplomatic architecture. Its significance lies in its unique position as the only comprehensive forum connecting the two largest continents, Asia and Europe. The 12th ASEM summit, held in Brussels in October 2018, exemplifies the ongoing effort to cultivate a shared understanding and collaborative approach to global challenges. To fully grasp the importance of this meeting and the ASEM framework itself, it is essential to dissect its origins, evolution, structure, objectives, and its implications for participating nations, including India.

Genesis of ASEM: Bridging the Continental Divide

The seeds of ASEM were sown in the mid-1990s, a period characterized by rapid globalization and the rise of Asia as an economic powerhouse. European nations, traditionally focused on transatlantic relations and internal integration, began to recognize the growing importance of engaging with Asia. Several factors contributed to this shift in perspective.

First, the economic success of the "Asian Tigers" (South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Singapore) demonstrated the potential for rapid economic growth and development in Asia. These countries had successfully adopted export-oriented strategies and integrated themselves into the global economy, becoming important trading partners for Europe. The subsequent rise of China as a manufacturing hub and a major consumer market further underscored the economic significance of Asia.

Second, the end of the Cold War had created a new geopolitical landscape, with opportunities for increased cooperation and dialogue between different regions of the world. The collapse of the Soviet Union had removed a major ideological barrier and opened up new avenues for trade, investment, and cultural exchange.

Third, there was a growing recognition that many global challenges, such as environmental degradation, terrorism, and pandemics, required international cooperation to address effectively. No single country or region could solve these problems alone. This realization led to a search for new platforms and mechanisms for multilateral cooperation.

In response to these factors, a group of European and Asian leaders began to explore the possibility of establishing a formal dialogue process between the two continents. The idea was to create a forum where leaders could meet regularly to discuss issues of mutual interest and to promote closer cooperation in areas such as trade, investment, security, and cultural exchange.

The initial impetus for ASEM came from Singapore, which hosted an informal meeting of Asian and European officials in 1994 to discuss the idea of establishing a formal dialogue process. This meeting was followed by a series of other informal consultations, which eventually led to the first ASEM summit in Bangkok, Thailand, in March 1996.

The Bangkok summit was a landmark event, bringing together the heads of state or government of 10 Asian countries (the then-members of ASEAN, plus China, Japan, and South Korea) and 15 European countries (the then-members of the European Union) along with the President of the European Commission. The summit adopted a declaration outlining the objectives and principles of ASEM, which included promoting greater understanding between Asia and Europe, fostering economic growth and development, and strengthening cooperation on global issues.

ASEM's Structure and Functioning: A Framework for Dialogue

ASEM is characterized by its informality and its emphasis on dialogue and consensus-building. It is not a treaty-based organization and does not have a formal secretariat or a binding legal framework. Instead, it operates through a series of regular meetings and consultations at different levels, including summits of heads of state or government, ministerial meetings, senior officials' meetings, and working groups.

The ASEM summit is the highest-level decision-making body of the organization. It is held every two years and brings together the heads of state or government of all ASEM members. The summit provides an opportunity for leaders to discuss strategic issues and to set the overall direction for ASEM cooperation.

Ministerial meetings are held more frequently than summits and focus on specific areas of cooperation, such as foreign affairs, economics, finance, transport, environment, and culture. These meetings provide a forum for ministers to exchange views, to identify priorities for cooperation, and to develop concrete initiatives.

Senior officials' meetings (SOMs) are held regularly to prepare for ministerial meetings and summits and to oversee the implementation of ASEM initiatives. SOMs are attended by senior officials from the foreign ministries and other relevant government agencies of ASEM members.

Working groups are established to address specific issues or to implement particular projects. These groups bring together experts from different countries to share knowledge and to develop practical solutions.

ASEM's decision-making process is based on consensus. All decisions must be agreed upon by all ASEM members. This approach ensures that all members have a voice in the decision-making process and that their interests are taken into account. However, it can also make it difficult to reach agreement on controversial issues.

The ASEM process is supported by a number of mechanisms, including the Asia-Europe Foundation (ASEF), which promotes cultural exchange and people-to-people contacts between Asia and Europe; the ASEM Trade Facilitation Action Plan (TFAP), which aims to reduce barriers to trade between Asia and Europe; and the ASEM Investment Promotion Action Plan (IPAP), which seeks to attract investment to both regions.

India's Engagement with ASEM: A Strategic Imperative

India joined ASEM in 2008, a significant development that reflected India's growing economic and political importance on the global stage. India's engagement with ASEM is driven by a number of strategic considerations.

First, ASEM provides India with a valuable platform for engaging with Europe, a key economic and political partner. Europe is one of India's largest trading partners and a major source of foreign investment. ASEM allows India to strengthen its economic ties with Europe and to promote its interests in the European market.

Second, ASEM provides India with an opportunity to work with other Asian countries to address common challenges, such as climate change, terrorism, and energy security. India shares many of the same concerns as other Asian countries and can benefit from collaborating with them to find solutions.

Third, ASEM allows India to project its influence on the global stage. By participating in ASEM, India can demonstrate its commitment to multilateralism and its willingness to work with other countries to address global challenges.

India has been an active participant in ASEM since joining the organization. It has hosted a number of ASEM meetings and has contributed to various ASEM initiatives. India has also used ASEM to promote its own priorities, such as strengthening connectivity between Asia and Europe and promoting sustainable development.

At the 12th ASEM summit in Brussels, India reiterated its commitment to strengthening ties with both Asia and Europe. India emphasized the importance of multilateralism and called for greater cooperation to address global challenges. India also highlighted its own efforts to promote economic growth and sustainable development.

India's engagement with ASEM is likely to continue to grow in importance in the years ahead. As India's economy continues to grow and its global influence increases, ASEM will provide it with an increasingly valuable platform for engaging with the world.

Thematic Focus of the 12th ASEM Summit: Global Partnerships for Global Challenges

The theme of the 12th ASEM summit, "Europe and Asia: Global Partners for Global Challenges," reflected the growing recognition that many of the most pressing issues facing the world today require international cooperation to address effectively. The summit focused on a number of key areas, including:

• Sustainable Development: ASEM members discussed ways to promote sustainable development and to address climate change. They agreed on the importance of implementing the Paris Agreement on climate change and of promoting renewable energy.
• Connectivity: ASEM members discussed ways to improve connectivity between Asia and Europe, including through infrastructure development and trade facilitation. They agreed on the importance of promoting the Belt and Road Initiative, a Chinese-led infrastructure development project that aims to connect Asia, Europe, and Africa.
• Security: ASEM members discussed ways to strengthen security cooperation and to address terrorism and other transnational threats. They agreed on the importance of sharing information and of coordinating their efforts to combat terrorism.
• Trade and Investment: ASEM members discussed ways to promote trade and investment between Asia and Europe. They agreed on the importance of reducing barriers to trade and of creating a more favorable investment climate.

Key Actors and Their Roles

The ASEM framework involves a diverse range of actors, each with distinct roles and interests. Understanding these actors and their motivations is crucial to comprehending the dynamics of ASEM.

• The European Union (EU): As an institutional partner, the EU plays a central role in ASEM. It represents the collective interests of its member states and provides a significant amount of funding and expertise to ASEM initiatives. The EU's priorities in ASEM include promoting its values, expanding trade, and ensuring security. However, internal divisions within the EU can sometimes limit its effectiveness in ASEM. The EU views ASEM as a crucial platform to solidify its standing in the global order.

• The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN): ASEAN is another institutional partner in ASEM, representing the interests of Southeast Asian nations. ASEAN's priorities in ASEM include promoting regional integration, economic development, and enhanced international standing. ASEAN's engagement in ASEM is shaped by the diverse levels of development and political systems among its member states.

• China: As a major economic and political power in Asia, China plays an increasingly important role in ASEM. China's priorities in ASEM include promoting its Belt and Road Initiative, expanding its trade and investment ties with Europe, and enhancing its global influence.

• Japan: Japan is another major economic power in Asia and a key player in ASEM. Japan's priorities in ASEM include promoting free trade, strengthening security cooperation, and addressing global challenges such as climate change.

• South Korea: South Korea is a dynamic economy and a strong supporter of multilateralism. South Korea's priorities in ASEM include promoting innovation, strengthening cultural exchange, and addressing regional security issues.

  Advertisement

• Russia: Although geographically spanning both Asia and Europe, Russia's engagement with ASEM is complex and influenced by its relations with both the EU and other Asian countries. Russia seeks to leverage ASEM to promote its economic and political interests in both regions.

ASEM and the Shifting Geopolitical Landscape

ASEM operates within a constantly evolving geopolitical landscape. Several key trends are shaping the dynamics of ASEM and influencing its future direction.

• The Rise of China: The rise of China as a major economic and political power has had a profound impact on ASEM. China's growing influence has led to both opportunities and challenges for ASEM members. On the one hand, China's economic growth has created new opportunities for trade and investment. On the other hand, China's assertive foreign policy has raised concerns among some ASEM members.

• The Re-emergence of Geopolitical Competition: The end of the Cold War was followed by a period of relative peace and stability. However, in recent years, geopolitical competition has re-emerged, particularly between the United States, China, and Russia. This competition has created new challenges for ASEM, as members are forced to navigate competing interests and pressures.

• The Rise of Populism and Nationalism: In many countries around the world, there has been a rise of populism and nationalism. This trend has led to increased protectionism and a questioning of multilateralism. The rise of populism and nationalism poses a challenge to ASEM, as it can undermine the consensus-based decision-making process and make it more difficult to reach agreement on key issues.

• Technological Disruption: Rapid technological advancements are transforming the global economy and creating new challenges and opportunities for ASEM members. ASEM needs to adapt to these changes and to ensure that its members can benefit from the opportunities created by technological disruption.

  Advertisement

ASEM's Strengths and Weaknesses

ASEM has a number of strengths that make it a valuable platform for dialogue and cooperation between Asia and Europe.

• Inclusiveness: ASEM is an inclusive forum that brings together a diverse range of countries from Asia and Europe. This inclusiveness allows for a broad exchange of views and perspectives.

• Informality: ASEM's informal nature allows for frank and open discussions. This informality can help to build trust and understanding among members.

• Flexibility: ASEM is a flexible framework that can adapt to changing circumstances. This flexibility allows ASEM to respond to emerging challenges and opportunities.

However, ASEM also has a number of weaknesses that limit its effectiveness.

• Lack of Binding Authority: ASEM is not a treaty-based organization and does not have binding authority. This means that ASEM decisions are not legally enforceable.

  Advertisement

• Consensus-Based Decision-Making: ASEM's consensus-based decision-making process can make it difficult to reach agreement on controversial issues.

• Limited Resources: ASEM has limited resources and relies heavily on voluntary contributions from its members. This can limit its ability to implement ambitious initiatives.

India's Strategic Gains from ASEM

India's membership in ASEM offers several strategic advantages:

• Enhanced Engagement with Europe: ASEM provides a structured framework for India to engage with the EU and individual European nations. This is crucial for strengthening economic ties, attracting investment, and promoting technological collaboration.

• Platform for Addressing Global Challenges: ASEM allows India to work with other Asian and European countries to address shared challenges such as climate change, terrorism, and cybersecurity. This collaboration is essential for promoting regional and global security.

• Projecting India's Influence: ASEM provides a platform for India to project its influence on the global stage and to demonstrate its commitment to multilateralism. This is important for enhancing India's international standing and for promoting its interests.

  Advertisement

• Promoting Connectivity: India can use ASEM to promote its connectivity initiatives, such as the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC), which aims to connect India with Russia and Europe through Central Asia.

Challenges and Opportunities for ASEM's Future

ASEM faces a number of challenges and opportunities in the years ahead.

• Adapting to the Changing Geopolitical Landscape: ASEM needs to adapt to the changing geopolitical landscape and to navigate the competing interests of its members. This will require strong leadership and a willingness to compromise.

• Strengthening Security Cooperation: ASEM needs to strengthen security cooperation to address terrorism and other transnational threats. This will require sharing information, coordinating efforts, and building trust among members.

• Promoting Sustainable Development: ASEM needs to promote sustainable development and to address climate change. This will require implementing the Paris Agreement, promoting renewable energy, and investing in green technologies.

• Enhancing Connectivity: ASEM needs to enhance connectivity between Asia and Europe. This will require investing in infrastructure, reducing barriers to trade, and promoting people-to-people contacts.

  Advertisement

• Leveraging Technological Innovation: ASEM needs to leverage technological innovation to promote economic growth and to address global challenges. This will require investing in research and development, promoting digital literacy, and creating a favorable regulatory environment.

The Role of Historical Connections and Colonial Legacies

The historical context of Asia-Europe relations, including trade routes like the Silk Road and the era of colonialism, profoundly shapes contemporary dynamics within ASEM. While these historical connections fostered cultural and economic exchanges, the legacy of colonialism introduced power imbalances and grievances that continue to influence interactions.

The Silk Road, for instance, represents a historical precedent of interconnectedness and mutual exchange. It highlights the potential for mutually beneficial partnerships between Asia and Europe. However, the colonial era disrupted these organic connections, creating dependencies and resentment. European powers extracted resources and imposed political control over vast swathes of Asia, leaving behind a legacy of economic exploitation and social disruption.

Within ASEM, these historical factors manifest in various ways. Developing Asian nations often seek to redress historical injustices and to assert their sovereignty. They may be wary of neo-colonial tendencies or conditional aid from European countries. European nations, on the other hand, may emphasize their historical role in promoting development and modernization in Asia.

Understanding these historical dynamics is crucial for fostering a more equitable and productive dialogue within ASEM. It requires acknowledging past wrongs, addressing lingering power imbalances, and building trust based on mutual respect.

ASEM and the Broader Context of Indian Foreign Policy

India's engagement with ASEM is closely linked to its broader foreign policy objectives. India seeks to promote a multi-aligned foreign policy, engaging with all major powers and regions of the world. ASEM provides a valuable platform for India to pursue this objective, allowing it to strengthen its ties with both Asia and Europe.

India's foreign policy is also guided by its commitment to multilateralism and its belief in the importance of international cooperation. ASEM provides a forum for India to work with other countries to address global challenges and to promote a rules-based international order.

Furthermore, India's "Act East" policy, which seeks to strengthen its ties with Southeast Asia and the wider Asia-Pacific region, is closely linked to its engagement with ASEM. ASEM provides a platform for India to connect with ASEAN and other Asian countries and to promote regional integration.

The Significance of Intergovernmental Processes and Global Challenges

The core of ASEM's operational structure lies in its nature as an intergovernmental process. This means that all activities, discussions, and decisions within ASEM are driven by the participating governments. It emphasizes the collaborative nature of the forum, where each member state has the opportunity to contribute to the agenda and shape the outcomes.

The focus on "global challenges" is another defining characteristic of ASEM. These challenges encompass a wide range of issues that transcend national borders, including climate change, terrorism, economic instability, pandemics, and cybersecurity. Addressing these challenges requires a coordinated, multilateral approach, making ASEM a crucial platform for fostering cooperation and developing joint solutions.

Stakeholder Positions and Underlying Interests

Understanding the positions and interests of the key stakeholders is essential for analyzing the dynamics of ASEM.

• India: India is committed to strengthening ties with both Asia and Europe. Its underlying interests include promoting economic growth, enhancing security, and increasing its global influence. India actively participates in ASEM discussions and initiatives, advocating for its priorities and promoting its interests.

• EU: The EU seeks to deepen engagement with Asia to address global challenges. Its underlying interests include promoting its values, expanding trade, and ensuring security. The EU actively participates in ASEM and promotes EU-Asia cooperation, seeking to shape the agenda and influence the outcomes.

• ASEAN: ASEAN aims to promote regional integration and cooperation with external partners. Its underlying interests include economic development, regional stability, and enhanced international standing. ASEAN engages in ASEM to promote ASEAN interests and cooperation, seeking to leverage the forum for its own benefit.

Broader Implications of ASEM

ASEM has a wide range of implications across various domains:

• Political: ASEM strengthens political dialogue and cooperation between Asia and Europe, fostering mutual understanding and building trust.
• Diplomatic: ASEM provides a platform for diplomatic engagement and relationship building, allowing countries to address bilateral and multilateral issues.
• Security: ASEM addresses security challenges through dialogue and cooperation, promoting regional and global security.
• Economic: ASEM promotes trade and investment between Asia and Europe, fostering economic growth and development.
• Social: ASEM facilitates cultural exchange and people-to-people connections, promoting understanding and tolerance.
• Environmental: ASEM addresses environmental challenges through joint initiatives, promoting sustainable development and protecting the environment.

Connections to Ongoing Issues and Future Outlook

ASEM operates within a dynamic context of ongoing issues, including:

• Growing Trade Tensions: Trade tensions between major economies, such as the United States and China, can impact ASEM by creating uncertainty and disrupting global trade flows.
• Climate Change: Climate change is a major challenge that requires international cooperation. ASEM provides a platform for Asia and Europe to work together to address this issue.
• Regional Security Challenges: Regional security challenges in Asia and Europe, such as the South China Sea dispute and the conflict in Ukraine, can impact ASEM by creating tensions and undermining stability.

Looking ahead, ASEM is likely to continue as a key forum for dialogue and cooperation between Asia and Europe. It will play an increasingly important role in addressing emerging global challenges and promoting shared interests. ASEM's success will depend on its ability to adapt to the changing geopolitical landscape, to strengthen security cooperation, to promote sustainable development, and to enhance connectivity. It needs to stay relevant in a world of increasing geopolitical tension.